Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
2.
J Med Virol ; 94(4): 1701-1706, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1527447

RESUMEN

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), may manifest as a life-threatening respiratory infection with systemic complications. Clinical manifestations among children are generally less severe than those seen in adults, but critical cases have increasingly been reported in infants less than 1 year of age. We report a severe case of neonatal COVID-19 requiring intensive care and mechanical ventilation, further complicated by a multidrug-resistant Enterobacter asburiae super-infection. Chest X-rays, lung ultrasound, and chest computed tomography revealed extensive interstitial pneumonia with multiple consolidations, associated with persistent increased work of breathing and feeding difficulties. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in respiratory specimens and stools, but not in other biological samples, with a rapid clearance in stools. Serological tests demonstrated a specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody response mounted by the neonate and sustained over time. The therapeutic approach included the use of enoxaparin and steroids which may have contributed to the bacterial complication, underlying the challenges in managing neonatal COVID-19, where the balance between viral replication and immunomodulation maybe even more challenging than in older ages.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Sepsis Neonatal/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/patología , Cuidados Críticos , Enterobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/complicaciones , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/patología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Sepsis Neonatal/complicaciones , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/patología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Sobreinfección/complicaciones , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Sobreinfección/patología , Sobreinfección/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 105(6): 1519-1520, 2021 10 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1497591

RESUMEN

In this study, we described the proportion of COVID-19 patients started on antibiotics empirically and the work-ups performed to diagnose bacterial superinfection. We used a retrospective cohort study design involving medical records of symptomatic, hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were admitted to these centers. A total of 481 patients were included, with a median age of 41.0 years (interquartile range, 28-58.5 years). A total of 72.1% (N = 347) of COVID-19 patients received antibiotics, either before or during admission. This is troublesome because none of the patients' bacterial culture or inflammatory markers, such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, were evaluated, and only 73 (15.2%) underwent radiological investigations. Therefore, national COVID-19 guidelines should emphasize the rational use of antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19, a primarily viral disease. Integrating antimicrobial stewardship into the COVID-19 response and expanding microbiological capacities in low-income countries are indispensable. Otherwise, we risk one pandemic aggravating another.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Sobreinfección/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Chest ; 160(1): e39-e44, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1291398

RESUMEN

CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man presented with shortness of breath, gradually worsening for the previous 2 weeks, associated with dry cough, sore throat, and diarrhea. He denied fever, chills, chest pain, abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting. He did not have any sick contacts or travel history outside of Michigan. His medical history included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and tobacco use. He was taking amiodarone, carvedilol, furosemide, pregabalin, and insulin. The patient appeared to be in mild respiratory distress. He was afebrile and had saturation at 93% on 3 L of oxygen, heart rate of 105 beats/min, BP of 145/99 mm Hg, and respiratory rate of 18 breaths/min. On auscultation, there were crackles on bilateral lung bases and chronic bilateral leg swelling with hyperpigmented changes. His WBC count was 6.0 K/cumm (3.5 to 10.6 K/cumm) with absolute lymphocyte count 0.7 K/cumm (1.0 to 3.8 K/cumm); serum creatinine was 2.81 mg/dL (0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL). He had elevated inflammatory markers (serum ferritin, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and creatinine phosphokinase). Chest radiography showed bilateral pulmonary opacities that were suggestive of multifocal pneumonia (Fig 1). Nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 was positive. Therapy was started with ceftriaxone, doxycycline, hydroxychloroquine, and methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg IV for 3 days. By day 3 of hospitalization, he required endotracheal intubation, vasopressor support, and continuous renal replacement. Blood cultures were negative; respiratory cultures revealed only normal oral flora, so antibiotic therapy was discontinued. On day 10, WBC count increased to 28 K/cumm, and chest radiography showed persistent bilateral opacities with left lower lobe consolidation. Repeat respiratory cultures grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Table 1). Antibiotic therapy with IV meropenem was started. His condition steadily improved; eventually by day 20, he was off vasopressors and was extubated. However, on day 23, he experienced significant hemoptysis that required reintubation and vasopressor support.


Asunto(s)
Aspergillus niger/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Hemoptisis , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Sobreinfección , Voriconazol/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/terapia , Deterioro Clínico , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Vías Clínicas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Hemoptisis/diagnóstico , Hemoptisis/etiología , Hemoptisis/terapia , Humanos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/complicaciones , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/fisiopatología , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Sobreinfección/microbiología , Sobreinfección/fisiopatología , Sobreinfección/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Cell Rep Med ; 2(4): 100229, 2021 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1129218

RESUMEN

The impact of secondary bacterial infections (superinfections) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not well understood. In this prospective, monocentric cohort study, we aim to investigate the impact of superinfections in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients are assessed for concomitant microbial infections by longitudinal analysis of tracheobronchial secretions, bronchoalveolar lavages, and blood cultures. In 45 critically ill patients, we identify 19 patients with superinfections (42.2%). Superinfections are detected on day 10 after intensive care admission. The proportion of participants alive and off invasive mechanical ventilation at study day 28 (ventilator-free days [VFDs] at 28 days) is substantially lower in patients with superinfection (subhazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.90; p = 0.028). Patients with pulmonary superinfections have a higher incidence of bacteremia, virus reactivations, yeast colonization, and required intensive care treatment for a longer time. Superinfections are frequent and associated with reduced VFDs at 28 days despite a high rate of empirical antibiotic therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/patología , Respiración Artificial , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Anciano , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/virología , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Sobreinfección/complicaciones , Sobreinfección/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(4): 1234-1237, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1076431

RESUMEN

We describe rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria among patients in dedicated coronavirus disease care units in a hospital in Maryland, USA, during May-June 2020. Critical illness, high antibiotic use, double occupancy of single rooms, and modified infection prevention practices were key contributing factors. Surveillance culturing aided in outbreak recognition and control.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crítica , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Control de Infecciones , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Sobreinfección , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Maryland/epidemiología , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/normas , Factores Desencadenantes , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Sobreinfección/microbiología
8.
Lancet Microbe ; 1(3): e107, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-623041
9.
Clin Chem ; 66(7): 966-972, 2020 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-197877

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More than 2 months separated the initial description of SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its widespread dissemination in the United States. Despite this lengthy interval, implementation of specific quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 tests in the US has been slow, and testing is still not widely available. Metagenomic sequencing offers the promise of unbiased detection of emerging pathogens, without requiring prior knowledge of the identity of the responsible agent or its genomic sequence. METHODS: To evaluate metagenomic approaches in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, laboratory-confirmed positive and negative samples from Seattle, WA were evaluated by metagenomic sequencing, with comparison to a 2019 reference genomic database created before the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Within 36 h our results showed clear identification of a novel human Betacoronavirus, closely related to known Betacoronaviruses of bats, in laboratory-proven cases of SARS-CoV-2. A subset of samples also showed superinfection or colonization with human parainfluenza virus 3 or Moraxella species, highlighting the need to test directly for SARS-CoV-2 as opposed to ruling out an infection using a viral respiratory panel. Samples negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR were also negative by metagenomic analysis, and positive for Rhinovirus A and C. Unlike targeted SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR testing, metagenomic analysis of these SARS-CoV-2 negative samples identified candidate etiological agents for the patients' respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results demonstrate the value of metagenomic analysis in the monitoring and response to this and future viral pandemics.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/genética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Metagenómica , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico , Betacoronavirus/clasificación , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/genética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Enterovirus/clasificación , Enterovirus/genética , Enterovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Nasofaringe/virología , Pandemias , Filogenia , Neumonía Viral/genética , Neumonía Viral/virología , ARN Viral/química , ARN Viral/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , SARS-CoV-2 , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Sobreinfección/virología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA